Magic: The Gathering

Legends of Runeterra traveler icon

merfolk

legacy
1095.93$
0.59% Metashare
50.7% [40.2% - 62.4%] Global Performance
18 Nov 2019 - 10 Mar 2020

Sample decklist

lands Lands (20)

9
Island
0.09$
4
Cavern of Souls
171.96$
1
Fiery Islet
1.99$
4
Mutavault
47.96$
2
Wasteland
47.98$

Creatures (28)

3
Cursecatcher
2.97$
2
Phantasmal Image
19.98$
4
Lord of Atlantis
35.96$
4
Master of the Pearl Trident
3.96$
4
Merfolk Trickster
3.96$
2
Harbinger of the Tides
0.98$
4
Silvergill Adept
1.4$
1
Brazen Borrower
8.99$
4
True-Name Nemesis
11.96$

Instants (4)

4
Force of Will
279.96$

Artifacts (8)

4
Chalice of the Void
231.96$
4
Aether Vial
31.96$

60 cards

Sideboard
2
Grafdigger's Cage
3.98$
2
Pithing Needle
1.38$
2
Flusterstorm
59.98$
1
Damping Sphere
0.79$
1
Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive
0.35$
1
Back to Basics
10.99$
3
Dismember
17.97$
2
Force of Negation
95.98$
1
Grip of Phyresis
0.49$

buy from TCGplayer $807.22

arena (copy) | arena | mtgo

Performance vs

Decks with a low number of matches are hidden, Show All.

Sort by

100.0% [51% - 100%] (4)
vs

ant
deck details
50.0% [15% - 85%] (4)
vs

bomberman
deck details
0.0% [0% - 49%] (4)
vs

death and taxes
deck details
50.0% [15% - 85%] (4)
vs

golgari depths
deck details
50.0% [21.5% - 78.5%] (8)
vs

grixis delver
deck details
80.0% [37.6% - 96.4%] (5)
vs

sultai delver
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

4c loam
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

4c sacrifice
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

artifact echo
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

azorius stoneblade
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

bant stoneblade
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

belcher
deck details
33.3% [6.1% - 79.2%](3)
vs

burn
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

dredge
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

eldrazi post
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

eldrazi stompy
deck details
66.7% [20.8% - 93.9%](3)
vs

elves
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

grixis control
deck details
66.7% [20.8% - 93.9%](3)
vs

grixis death's shadow
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

hardened scales
deck details
0.0% [-0% - 56.1%](3)
vs

hogaak
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

infect
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

izzet delver
deck details
66.7% [20.8% - 93.9%](3)
vs

jeskai mentor
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

jeskai stoneblade
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

lands
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

maverick
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

miracles
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

mono-blue delver
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

mono-red eldrazi
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

mono-red prison
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

selesnya depths
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

sneak and show
deck details
66.7% [20.8% - 93.9%](3)
vs

sultai control
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

tes
deck details

Converted mana cost and cards popularity

Maindeck
cards popularity

#1

Force of Will

69.99$

average 4.0 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#2

True-Name Nemesis

True-Name Nemesis

2.99$

average 4.0 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#3

Aether Vial

7.99$

average 4.0 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#4

Lord of Atlantis

Lord of Atlantis

8.99$

average 4.0 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#5

Master of the Pearl Trident

Master of the Pearl Trident

0.99$

average 4.0 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#6

Chalice of the Void

Chalice of the Void

57.99$

average 3.8 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#7

Silvergill Adept

Silvergill Adept

0.35$

average 4.0 per deck in 90.0% of decks.

#8

Merfolk Trickster

Merfolk Trickster

0.99$

average 3.4 per deck in 90.0% of decks.

#9

Cursecatcher

0.99$

average 2.8 per deck in 80.0% of decks.

#10

Phantasmal Image

Phantasmal Image

9.99$

average 2.6 per deck in 70.0% of decks.

#11

Brazen Borrower

Brazen Borrower

8.99$

average 2.3 per deck in 70.0% of decks.

#12

Harbinger of the Tides

Harbinger of the Tides

0.49$

average 2.0 per deck in 70.0% of decks.

#13

Daze

2.49$

average 2.2 per deck in 60.0% of decks.

#14

Hexdrinker

4.99$

average 3.0 per deck in 10.0% of decks.

Sideboard
cards popularity

#1

Dismember

5.99$

average 2.6 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#2

Force of Negation

Force of Negation

47.99$

average 1.9 per deck in 90.0% of decks.

#3

Grafdigger's Cage

Grafdigger's Cage

1.99$

average 2.1 per deck in 80.0% of decks.

#4

Back to Basics

10.99$

average 1.7 per deck in 60.0% of decks.

#5

Echoing Truth

0.39$

average 1.4 per deck in 50.0% of decks.

#6

Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive

Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive

0.35$

average 1.0 per deck in 50.0% of decks.

#7

Faerie Macabre

2.49$

average 2.3 per deck in 40.0% of decks.

#8

Relic of Progenitus

Relic of Progenitus

6.49$

average 1.8 per deck in 40.0% of decks.

#9

Flusterstorm

29.99$

average 2.0 per deck in 30.0% of decks.

#10

Mistcaller

0.49$

average 1.7 per deck in 30.0% of decks.

#11

Brazen Borrower

Brazen Borrower

8.99$

average 1.7 per deck in 30.0% of decks.

#12

Submerge

4.99$

average 1.7 per deck in 30.0% of decks.

#13

Sorcerous Spyglass

Sorcerous Spyglass

0.35$

average 1.0 per deck in 30.0% of decks.

#14

Damping Sphere

0.79$

average 2.0 per deck in 20.0% of decks.

CMC sorting
from sample decklist

Starting hand
from sample decklist

Simple Playtest
from sample decklist

20

Visual View
from sample decklist

9

Island

4

Cavern of Souls

1

Fiery Islet

4

Mutavault

2

Wasteland

3

Cursecatcher

2

Phantasmal Image

4

Lord of Atlantis

4

Master of the Pearl Trident

4

Merfolk Trickster

2

Harbinger of the Tides

4

Silvergill Adept

1

Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft

4

True-Name Nemesis

4

Force of Will

4

Chalice of the Void

4

Aether Vial

2

Grafdigger's Cage

2

Pithing Needle

2

Flusterstorm

1

Damping Sphere

1

Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive

1

Back to Basics

3

Dismember

2

Force of Negation

1

Grip of Phyresis

Latest tournament results

Metagame and Performance History

Performance over time
(yellow line is cumulative - everything until that point)

Metashare over time
(yellow line is cumulative - everything until that point)

Currently doing updates, some information might not be entirely accurate. Check again in a few minutes.

top