Magic: The Gathering

Legends of Runeterra traveler icon

gruul fires (kaheera)

standard
145.57$
0.97% Metashare
52.04% [47.8% - 56.4%] Global Performance
18 Nov 2019 - 01 Jun 2020

Sample decklist

lands Lands (29)

11
Forest
0.11$
6
Mountain
0.06$
2
Fabled Passage
13.98$
2
Castle Embereth
0.98$
4
Temple of Abandon
1.96$
4
Stomping Ground
55.96$

Creatures (25)

4
Arboreal Grazer
1.4$
4
Creeping Trailblazer
1.4$
1
Gemrazer
0.79$
4
Shifting Ceratops
1.96$
4
Scampering Scorcher
1.4$
4
Questing Beast
27.96$
4
Cavalier of Flame
7.96$

Artifacts (2)

2
Embercleave
15.98$

Enchantments (4)

4
Fires of Invention
1.96$

60 cards

Sideboard
3
Grafdigger's Cage
5.97$
1
Sorcerous Spyglass
0.35$
2
Cindervines
0.98$
3
Chandra's Pyrohelix
1.05$
2
Flame Sweep
0.7$
1
Kaheera, the Orphanguard
0.59$
2
Gemrazer
1.58$
1
The Akroan War
0.49$

buy from TCGplayer $68.19

arena (copy) | arena | mtgo

Performance vs

Decks with a low number of matches are hidden, Show All.

Sort by

40.0% [16.8% - 68.7%] (10)
vs

4c fires (yorion)
deck details
50.0% [39% - 61%] (76)
vs

bant ramp (yorion)
deck details
50.0% [25.4% - 74.6%] (12)
vs

boros cycling (lurrus)
deck details
100.0% [67.6% - 100%] (8)
vs

gyruda
deck details
50.0% [21.5% - 78.5%] (8)
vs

jeskai cycling (lurrus)
deck details
52.1% [42.1% - 61.9%] (94)
vs

jeskai fires (keruga)
deck details
44.9% [31.9% - 58.7%] (49)
vs

jeskai fires (yorion)
deck details
50.0% [23.7% - 76.3%] (10)
vs

jeskai winota
deck details
63.6% [35.4% - 84.8%] (11)
vs

mono-black aggro (obosh)
deck details
66.7% [41.7% - 84.8%] (15)
vs

mono-red aggro
deck details
42.9% [24.5% - 63.5%] (21)
vs

rakdos sacrifice (lurrus)
deck details
37.5% [22.9% - 54.7%] (32)
vs

rakdos sacrifice (obosh)
deck details
51.6% [39.4% - 63.6%] (62)
vs

temur reclamation
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

4c lukka fires (yorion)
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

4c mutate (umori)
deck details
66.7% [20.8% - 93.9%](3)
vs

4c ramp (yorion)
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

4c winota
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

5c niv (yorion)
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

5c niv jengatha
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

abzan mutate (kaheera)
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

azorius blink
deck details
80.0% [37.6% - 96.4%](5)
vs

azorius control
deck details
25.0% [4.6% - 69.9%](4)
vs

azorius control (yorion)
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

bant ramp
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

bant ramp (gyruda)
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

dark jeskai fires (yorion)
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

dimir control
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

dimir flash
deck details
33.3% [6.1% - 79.2%](3)
vs

dimir flash (umori)
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

dimir flash mutate (umori)
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

esper aristocrats
deck details
33.3% [9.7% - 70%](6)
vs

esper control (yorion)
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

esper enchantment control (yorion)
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

esper fires (yorion)
deck details
100.0% [43.9% - 100%](3)
vs

gruul midrange
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

izzet aggro
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

izzet phoenix
deck details
100.0% [51% - 100%](4)
vs

jeskai control (kaheera)
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

jeskai control (keruga)
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

jeskai control (yorion)
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

jeskai fires
deck details
100.0% [34.2% - 100%](2)
vs

jeskai fires superfriends
deck details
100.0% [34.2% - 100%](2)
vs

jeskai heroic (lurrus)
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

jeskai lukka (yorion)
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

jeskai stompy
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

jeskai superfriends (zirda)
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

jund aggro (lurrus)
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

jund sacrifice
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

mardu humans
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

mono-black sacrifice
deck details
66.7% [20.8% - 93.9%](3)
vs

mono-blue flash
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

mono-green stompy
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

mono-red aggro (obosh)
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

mono-white auras (lurrus)
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

mono-white lifegain
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

naya winota
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

orzhov auras (lurrus)
deck details
33.3% [6.1% - 79.2%](3)
vs

orzhov sacrifice (lurrus)
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

rakdos knights
deck details
50.0% [15% - 85%](4)
vs

simic flash
deck details
57.1% [25% - 84.2%](7)
vs

sultai midrange
deck details
50.0% [9.5% - 90.5%](2)
vs

sultai ramp
deck details
50.0% [18.8% - 81.2%](6)
vs

sultai ramp (yorion)
deck details
0.0% [0% - 79.3%](1)
vs

sultai titan's nest
deck details
50.0% [18.8% - 81.2%](6)
vs

temur adventure
deck details
100.0% [20.7% - 100%](1)
vs

temur elementals
deck details
66.7% [20.8% - 93.9%](3)
vs

temur elementals (yorion)
deck details
100.0% [34.2% - 100%](2)
vs

temur reclamation (yorion)
deck details

Converted mana cost and cards popularity

Maindeck
cards popularity

#1

Fires of Invention

Fires of Invention

0.49$

average 4.0 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#2

Cavalier of Flame

Cavalier of Flame

1.99$

average 3.9 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#3

Arboreal Grazer

Arboreal Grazer

0.35$

average 3.9 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#4

Shifting Ceratops

Shifting Ceratops

0.49$

average 3.2 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#5

Questing Beast

6.99$

average 3.2 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#6

Embercleave

7.99$

average 1.7 per deck in 90.8% of decks.

#7

Vivien, Monsters' Advocate

Vivien, Monsters' Advocate

4.99$

average 2.0 per deck in 86.8% of decks.

#8

Quartzwood Crasher

Quartzwood Crasher

0.99$

average 2.6 per deck in 79.6% of decks.

#9

Thrashing Brontodon

Thrashing Brontodon

0.35$

average 3.0 per deck in 78.9% of decks.

#10

Gemrazer

0.79$

average 1.7 per deck in 70.4% of decks.

#11

Scorching Dragonfire

Scorching Dragonfire

0.35$

average 1.7 per deck in 63.2% of decks.

#12

Fire Prophecy

0.35$

average 1.9 per deck in 39.5% of decks.

#13

Cavalier of Thorns

Cavalier of Thorns

1.79$

average 3.0 per deck in 21.7% of decks.

#14

Adventurous Impulse

Adventurous Impulse

0.35$

average 1.8 per deck in 21.7% of decks.

Sideboard
cards popularity

#1

Kaheera, the Orphanguard

Kaheera, the Orphanguard

0.59$

average 1.0 per deck in 100.0% of decks.

#2

Grafdigger's Cage

Grafdigger's Cage

1.99$

average 2.7 per deck in 96.1% of decks.

#3

Flame Sweep

0.35$

average 3.2 per deck in 92.8% of decks.

#4

Scorching Dragonfire

Scorching Dragonfire

0.35$

average 2.1 per deck in 76.3% of decks.

#5

Fry

0.35$

average 1.8 per deck in 65.1% of decks.

#6

Shifting Ceratops

Shifting Ceratops

0.49$

average 1.3 per deck in 52.6% of decks.

#7

Cindervines

0.49$

average 2.1 per deck in 43.4% of decks.

#8

Storm's Wrath

0.49$

average 2.1 per deck in 42.1% of decks.

#9

The Akroan War

0.49$

average 1.9 per deck in 31.6% of decks.

#10

Chandra, Awakened Inferno

Chandra, Awakened Inferno

2.99$

average 1.2 per deck in 27.6% of decks.

#11

Domri's Ambush

0.35$

average 1.8 per deck in 21.1% of decks.

#12

Gemrazer

0.79$

average 1.9 per deck in 13.2% of decks.

#13

Thrashing Brontodon

Thrashing Brontodon

0.35$

average 1.4 per deck in 10.5% of decks.

#14

Mystic Repeal

0.35$

average 2.5 per deck in 6.6% of decks.

CMC sorting
from sample decklist

Starting hand
from sample decklist

Simple Playtest
from sample decklist

20

Visual View
from sample decklist

11

Forest

6

Mountain

2

Fabled Passage

2

Castle Embereth

4

Temple of Abandon

4

Stomping Ground

4

Arboreal Grazer

4

Creeping Trailblazer

1

Gemrazer

4

Shifting Ceratops

4

Scampering Scorcher

4

Questing Beast

4

Cavalier of Flame

2

Embercleave

4

Fires of Invention

3

Grafdigger's Cage

1

Sorcerous Spyglass

2

Cindervines

3

Chandra's Pyrohelix

2

Flame Sweep

1

Kaheera, the Orphanguard

2

Gemrazer

1

The Akroan War

Latest tournament results

Metagame and Performance History

Performance over time
(yellow line is cumulative - everything until that point)

Metashare over time
(yellow line is cumulative - everything until that point)

Currently doing updates, some information might not be entirely accurate. Check again in a few minutes.

top