mtg icon Magic: The Gathering
mtg icon Magic: The Gathering

Magic Online Format Challenge Breakdown – July 12, 2022

How’s it going everyone? Today we’re looking at the various format challenges from this past weekend on Magic Online. These events are six to nine round events that feature some of the best players in the world battling it out for prizes and clout. This is one-stop-shop to look at all the decks that finished with at least two top 16s over the course of the two challenges per format on Magic Online.

Think of this article as your metric for the diversity of decks in the winners’ metagame of each format along with taking a brief look at what decks might be quietly over-performing despite previous expectations.

Standard

standard
25 Jan 2022 - 01 Sep 2022
scroll right
win
rate
vs
esper midrange
vs
orzhov midrange
vs
jeskai hinata
vs
other
vs
naya runes
vs
Mono White Aggro
vs
boros aggro
vs
Mono Green Stompy
vs
Jeskai Combo
vs
jund midrange
vs
izzet control
vs
rakdos anvil
vs
grixis vampires
vs
azorius control
vs
selesnya midrange
vs
temur aggro
vs
mardu midrange
vs
esper control
vs
rakdos midrange
vs
naya humans
vs
golgari midrange
vs
temur control
esper midrange
10.37% metagame
3094 matches
global 52.4% [50.6%-54.1%]
-
59.8%
311 matches
50.5%
212 matches
60.9%
192 matches
41.9%
272 matches
58.6%
174 matches
60.2%
133 matches
45.9%
111 matches
44.8%
192 matches
59.7%
159 matches
50.0%
104 matches
44.9%
118 matches
39.4%
132 matches
60.8%
79 matches
42.3%
71 matches
45.2%
62 matches
39.7%
73 matches
64.7%
34 matches
58.7%
46 matches
40.6%
32 matches
60.5%
38 matches
41.2%
68 matches
esper midrange
10.37% metagame
3094 matches
global 52.4% [50.6%-54.1%]
orzhov midrange
10.28% metagame
3060 matches
global 52.7% [50.9%-54.5%]
40.2%
311 matches
-
40.5%
190 matches
62.7%
110 matches
46.9%
209 matches
57.4%
251 matches
54.7%
117 matches
53.8%
145 matches
50.0%
134 matches
57.7%
71 matches
56.8%
139 matches
57.3%
103 matches
55.3%
38 matches
48.3%
118 matches
56.2%
121 matches
53.9%
76 matches
47.3%
74 matches
68.6%
70 matches
50.0%
42 matches
45.3%
75 matches
54.8%
62 matches
28.6%
21 matches
orzhov midrange
10.28% metagame
3060 matches
global 52.7% [50.9%-54.5%]
jeskai hinata
7.31% metagame
1777 matches
global 54.1% [51.8%-56.4%]
49.5%
212 matches
59.5%
190 matches
-
64.8%
122 matches
53.9%
102 matches
42.5%
87 matches
51.9%
131 matches
51.4%
111 matches
57.7%
52 matches
65.9%
82 matches
50.0%
62 matches
38.3%
47 matches
60.3%
121 matches
48.7%
39 matches
45.0%
20 matches
51.9%
27 matches
56.5%
23 matches
76.5%
17 matches
33.3%
36 matches
63.6%
11 matches
60.0%
10 matches
55.0%
40 matches
jeskai hinata
7.31% metagame
1777 matches
global 54.1% [51.8%-56.4%]
other
6.02% metagame
1562 matches
global 38.7% [36.3%-41.1%]
39.1%
192 matches
37.3%
110 matches
35.2%
122 matches
-
32.3%
99 matches
36.4%
88 matches
31.8%
66 matches
39.0%
77 matches
31.3%
48 matches
50.0%
88 matches
57.1%
35 matches
30.3%
66 matches
40.7%
81 matches
45.2%
31 matches
46.7%
15 matches
33.3%
24 matches
37.9%
29 matches
33.3%
24 matches
47.1%
34 matches
23.1%
13 matches
44.4%
9 matches
40.7%
27 matches
other
6.02% metagame
1562 matches
global 38.7% [36.3%-41.1%]
naya runes
5.92% metagame
1883 matches
global 53.2% [51%-55.5%]
58.1%
272 matches
53.1%
209 matches
46.1%
102 matches
67.7%
99 matches
-
30.1%
133 matches
35.1%
77 matches
66.7%
69 matches
39.6%
111 matches
58.2%
91 matches
57.9%
57 matches
72.0%
93 matches
48.8%
43 matches
38.1%
42 matches
46.9%
32 matches
68.4%
38 matches
62.8%
43 matches
60.7%
28 matches
73.9%
23 matches
37.9%
29 matches
62.5%
16 matches
28.6%
14 matches
naya runes
5.92% metagame
1883 matches
global 53.2% [51%-55.5%]
Mono White Aggro
5.86% metagame
1695 matches
global 51.8% [49.4%-54.2%]
41.4%
174 matches
42.6%
251 matches
57.5%
87 matches
63.6%
88 matches
69.9%
133 matches
-
67.6%
71 matches
52.3%
44 matches
59.7%
77 matches
44.4%
54 matches
50.0%
48 matches
44.1%
59 matches
33.3%
36 matches
53.5%
43 matches
45.8%
59 matches
63.3%
30 matches
36.6%
41 matches
37.5%
32 matches
56.5%
23 matches
59.3%
27 matches
33.3%
30 matches
40.0%
15 matches
Mono White Aggro
5.86% metagame
1695 matches
global 51.8% [49.4%-54.2%]
boros aggro
4.45% metagame
1120 matches
global 50.5% [47.6%-53.5%]
39.8%
133 matches
45.3%
117 matches
48.1%
131 matches
68.2%
66 matches
64.9%
77 matches
32.4%
71 matches
-
49.2%
61 matches
67.7%
31 matches
48.4%
31 matches
50.0%
28 matches
31.3%
32 matches
52.0%
50 matches
42.3%
26 matches
46.7%
15 matches
42.3%
26 matches
78.6%
14 matches
72.7%
11 matches
42.1%
19 matches
57.9%
19 matches
40.0%
10 matches
73.9%
23 matches
boros aggro
4.45% metagame
1120 matches
global 50.5% [47.6%-53.5%]
Mono Green Stompy
4.38% metagame
1158 matches
global 52.5% [49.6%-55.4%]
54.1%
111 matches
46.2%
145 matches
48.6%
111 matches
61.0%
77 matches
33.3%
69 matches
47.7%
44 matches
50.8%
61 matches
-
48.0%
25 matches
58.7%
46 matches
70.2%
47 matches
60.5%
43 matches
70.0%
40 matches
36.8%
19 matches
48.0%
25 matches
40.7%
27 matches
50.0%
10 matches
54.5%
22 matches
50.0%
20 matches
50.0%
12 matches
69.2%
13 matches
40.0%
10 matches
Mono Green Stompy
4.38% metagame
1158 matches
global 52.5% [49.6%-55.4%]
Jeskai Combo
3.68% metagame
1143 matches
global 51.0% [48.1%-53.9%]
55.2%
192 matches
50.0%
134 matches
42.3%
52 matches
68.8%
48 matches
60.4%
111 matches
40.3%
77 matches
32.3%
31 matches
52.0%
25 matches
-
44.7%
38 matches
51.3%
39 matches
43.6%
39 matches
45.5%
44 matches
54.3%
35 matches
33.3%
24 matches
52.9%
17 matches
45.0%
20 matches
58.8%
17 matches
57.1%
7 matches
41.2%
17 matches
33.3%
3 matches
46.2%
13 matches
Jeskai Combo
3.68% metagame
1143 matches
global 51.0% [48.1%-53.9%]
jund midrange
3.56% metagame
1081 matches
global 49.1% [46.1%-52.1%]
40.3%
159 matches
42.3%
71 matches
34.1%
82 matches
50.0%
88 matches
41.8%
91 matches
55.6%
54 matches
51.6%
31 matches
41.3%
46 matches
55.3%
38 matches
-
55.6%
45 matches
67.5%
40 matches
63.8%
47 matches
42.9%
7 matches
60.0%
5 matches
52.4%
21 matches
61.5%
13 matches
62.5%
16 matches
70.0%
10 matches
50.0%
6 matches
62.5%
8 matches
36.8%
19 matches
jund midrange
3.56% metagame
1081 matches
global 49.1% [46.1%-52.1%]
izzet control
3.46% metagame
1027 matches
global 47.0% [44%-50.1%]
50.0%
104 matches
43.2%
139 matches
50.0%
62 matches
42.9%
35 matches
42.1%
57 matches
50.0%
48 matches
50.0%
28 matches
29.8%
47 matches
48.7%
39 matches
44.4%
45 matches
-
33.3%
24 matches
43.5%
23 matches
47.2%
36 matches
52.4%
21 matches
61.5%
26 matches
41.7%
24 matches
50.0%
30 matches
33.3%
15 matches
64.0%
25 matches
75.0%
8 matches
70.0%
10 matches
izzet control
3.46% metagame
1027 matches
global 47.0% [44%-50.1%]
rakdos anvil
3.41% metagame
951 matches
global 49.6% [46.5%-52.8%]
55.1%
118 matches
42.7%
103 matches
61.7%
47 matches
69.7%
66 matches
28.0%
93 matches
55.9%
59 matches
68.8%
32 matches
39.5%
43 matches
56.4%
39 matches
32.5%
40 matches
66.7%
24 matches
-
50.0%
16 matches
50.0%
28 matches
39.3%
28 matches
35.3%
17 matches
50.0%
18 matches
42.9%
7 matches
64.7%
17 matches
80.0%
15 matches
36.4%
11 matches
33.3%
3 matches
rakdos anvil
3.41% metagame
951 matches
global 49.6% [46.5%-52.8%]
grixis vampires
3.21% metagame
855 matches
global 50.9% [47.5%-54.2%]
60.6%
132 matches
44.7%
38 matches
39.7%
121 matches
59.3%
81 matches
51.2%
43 matches
66.7%
36 matches
48.0%
50 matches
30.0%
40 matches
54.5%
44 matches
36.2%
47 matches
56.5%
23 matches
50.0%
16 matches
-
100.0%
4 matches
75.0%
4 matches
12.5%
8 matches
53.8%
13 matches
83.3%
6 matches
58.3%
12 matches
33.3%
6 matches
25.0%
4 matches
32.3%
31 matches
grixis vampires
3.21% metagame
855 matches
global 50.9% [47.5%-54.2%]
azorius control
2.42% metagame
767 matches
global 49.5% [46%-53.1%]
39.2%
79 matches
51.7%
118 matches
51.3%
39 matches
54.8%
31 matches
61.9%
42 matches
46.5%
43 matches
57.7%
26 matches
63.2%
19 matches
45.7%
35 matches
57.1%
7 matches
52.8%
36 matches
50.0%
28 matches
0.0%
4 matches
-
61.5%
26 matches
30.4%
23 matches
44.4%
18 matches
75.0%
8 matches
40.0%
10 matches
29.4%
17 matches
64.3%
14 matches
0.0%
1 matches
azorius control
2.42% metagame
767 matches
global 49.5% [46%-53.1%]
selesnya midrange
2.15% metagame
643 matches
global 53.2% [49.3%-57%]
57.7%
71 matches
43.8%
121 matches
55.0%
20 matches
53.3%
15 matches
53.1%
32 matches
54.2%
59 matches
53.3%
15 matches
52.0%
25 matches
66.7%
24 matches
40.0%
5 matches
47.6%
21 matches
60.7%
28 matches
25.0%
4 matches
38.5%
26 matches
-
41.2%
17 matches
55.0%
20 matches
36.4%
11 matches
75.0%
8 matches
47.6%
21 matches
62.5%
8 matches
-
selesnya midrange
2.15% metagame
643 matches
global 53.2% [49.3%-57%]
temur aggro
1.89% metagame
575 matches
global 54.4% [50.3%-58.5%]
54.8%
62 matches
46.1%
76 matches
48.1%
27 matches
66.7%
24 matches
31.6%
38 matches
36.7%
30 matches
57.7%
26 matches
59.3%
27 matches
47.1%
17 matches
47.6%
21 matches
38.5%
26 matches
64.7%
17 matches
87.5%
8 matches
69.6%
23 matches
58.8%
17 matches
-
56.3%
16 matches
50.0%
8 matches
81.8%
11 matches
61.5%
13 matches
100.0%
4 matches
44.4%
9 matches
temur aggro
1.89% metagame
575 matches
global 54.4% [50.3%-58.5%]
mardu midrange
1.75% metagame
564 matches
global 51.4% [47.3%-55.5%]
60.3%
73 matches
52.7%
74 matches
43.5%
23 matches
62.1%
29 matches
37.2%
43 matches
63.4%
41 matches
21.4%
14 matches
50.0%
10 matches
55.0%
20 matches
38.5%
13 matches
58.3%
24 matches
50.0%
18 matches
46.2%
13 matches
55.6%
18 matches
45.0%
20 matches
43.8%
16 matches
-
100.0%
7 matches
36.4%
11 matches
40.0%
5 matches
36.4%
11 matches
25.0%
4 matches
mardu midrange
1.75% metagame
564 matches
global 51.4% [47.3%-55.5%]
esper control
1.34% metagame
433 matches
global 43.2% [38.6%-47.9%]
35.3%
34 matches
31.4%
70 matches
23.5%
17 matches
66.7%
24 matches
39.3%
28 matches
62.5%
32 matches
27.3%
11 matches
45.5%
22 matches
41.2%
17 matches
37.5%
16 matches
50.0%
30 matches
57.1%
7 matches
16.7%
6 matches
25.0%
8 matches
63.6%
11 matches
50.0%
8 matches
0.0%
7 matches
-
50.0%
4 matches
62.5%
8 matches
40.0%
5 matches
100.0%
1 matches
esper control
1.34% metagame
433 matches
global 43.2% [38.6%-47.9%]
rakdos midrange
1.32% metagame
413 matches
global 48.9% [44.1%-53.7%]
41.3%
46 matches
50.0%
42 matches
66.7%
36 matches
52.9%
34 matches
26.1%
23 matches
43.5%
23 matches
57.9%
19 matches
50.0%
20 matches
42.9%
7 matches
30.0%
10 matches
66.7%
15 matches
35.3%
17 matches
41.7%
12 matches
60.0%
10 matches
25.0%
8 matches
18.2%
11 matches
63.6%
11 matches
50.0%
4 matches
-
33.3%
3 matches
80.0%
5 matches
14.3%
7 matches
rakdos midrange
1.32% metagame
413 matches
global 48.9% [44.1%-53.7%]
naya humans
1.30% metagame
441 matches
global 52.4% [47.7%-57%]
59.4%
32 matches
54.7%
75 matches
36.4%
11 matches
76.9%
13 matches
62.1%
29 matches
40.7%
27 matches
42.1%
19 matches
50.0%
12 matches
58.8%
17 matches
50.0%
6 matches
36.0%
25 matches
20.0%
15 matches
66.7%
6 matches
70.6%
17 matches
52.4%
21 matches
38.5%
13 matches
60.0%
5 matches
37.5%
8 matches
66.7%
3 matches
-
60.0%
10 matches
0.0%
1 matches
naya humans
1.30% metagame
441 matches
global 52.4% [47.7%-57%]
golgari midrange
1.07% metagame
345 matches
global 48.4% [43.2%-53.7%]
39.5%
38 matches
45.2%
62 matches
40.0%
10 matches
55.6%
9 matches
37.5%
16 matches
66.7%
30 matches
60.0%
10 matches
30.8%
13 matches
66.7%
3 matches
37.5%
8 matches
25.0%
8 matches
63.6%
11 matches
75.0%
4 matches
35.7%
14 matches
37.5%
8 matches
0.0%
4 matches
63.6%
11 matches
60.0%
5 matches
20.0%
5 matches
40.0%
10 matches
-
50.0%
2 matches
golgari midrange
1.07% metagame
345 matches
global 48.4% [43.2%-53.7%]
temur control
1.05% metagame
356 matches
global 56.5% [51.3%-61.5%]
58.8%
68 matches
71.4%
21 matches
45.0%
40 matches
59.3%
27 matches
71.4%
14 matches
60.0%
15 matches
26.1%
23 matches
60.0%
10 matches
53.8%
13 matches
63.2%
19 matches
30.0%
10 matches
66.7%
3 matches
67.7%
31 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
55.6%
9 matches
75.0%
4 matches
0.0%
1 matches
85.7%
7 matches
100.0%
1 matches
50.0%
2 matches
-
temur control
1.05% metagame
356 matches
global 56.5% [51.3%-61.5%]
vs
esper midrange
vs
orzhov midrange
vs
jeskai hinata
vs
other
vs
naya runes
vs
Mono White Aggro
vs
boros aggro
vs
Mono Green Stompy
vs
Jeskai Combo
vs
jund midrange
vs
izzet control
vs
rakdos anvil
vs
grixis vampires
vs
azorius control
vs
selesnya midrange
vs
temur aggro
vs
mardu midrange
vs
esper control
vs
rakdos midrange
vs
naya humans
vs
golgari midrange
vs
temur control

Remember how I said that this article can serve as a measurement of deck diversity at the winner’s tables? Well, for Standard, we can throw that right out. There were only four decks with two or more top 16s and among those four decks, there were clearly two that outpaced the rest of the field by more than three-times.

Jeskai Hinata remains at the top of the Standard Metagame with 13 top finishes. Since winning the Streets of New Capenna Set Championship, there has been some developments in the metagame for challenges on Magic Online, but it seems like most top players have started taking this deck and running it right to the top tables without much adaptation. While one other deck also put-up strong results, it is hard to dismiss the dominance of Jeskai Hinata in Standard. The deck won both challenges and put-up an additional six copies into top 8, meaning half of the two-challenge top 8s were Jeskai Hinata.

Alongside Jeskai Hinata, Orzhov Midrange put up a strong showing of 10 top finishes, coming off the heels of streamer Misplaced Ginger winning a challenge with the deck last week. This appears to be the only major challenger to Jeskai Hinata’s crown in Standard, but the deck had issues beating Hinata in the top 8 with a top 4 finish Saturday and a finals appearance Sunday, losing to Hinata both times. While Orzhov Midrange may be poised to beat the rest of the format, if it can beat Hinata is still up for deliberation.

Alongside Jeskai Hinata and Orzhov Midrange, Boros Aggro and Mono Green Stompy put up 3 and 2 qualifying finishes respectively. That’s right, the only other decks with more than one top finish each add up to half of Orzhovs’ finishes combined. That’s not a great place for any format to be in terms of diversity and while these decks appear to be strong, it is concerning that we could add the third and fourth place decks together, multiply it twice, and still not reach the top spot.

Pioneer

Pioneer has been having some major shake-ups since the banning of Expressive Iteration and Winota, Joiner of Forces. With these major staples out of the format, Mono Green Devotion quickly sprinted ahead of the pack, but the past few weekends, we’ve seen the meta start to catch up and take down Karn, the Great Creator. This weekend, Mono Green didn’t have a single top 16 finish between the two challenges and seems to have fallen off the radar of top decks.

Keeping that in mind, we’ve seen an uptick in a few decks including Rakdos Midrange and Izzet Phoenix, both of which came out with the most top finishes with six each. Other decks to manage more than two finishes included Azorius Control, Boros Heroic, and Lotus Field Combo. While most of these have been long time staples of the format, we saw a lack of Azorius Control and Lotus Field with the high meta presence of Mono Green Devotion. With the shift to a more interactive and midrange metagame, we’re seeing combo and control start to look to dethrone perennial favorites Phoenix and Rakdos Midrange.

We even saw Lotus Fiend come back from a long drought of top finishes to win both challenges this past weekend. Even though it only had three total top finishes, it’s always worth noting when a single deck manages to sweep the challenges for the weekend, especially when piloted by different players.

Heroic seems to be struggling to find the same level of success as it did in the past few weeks. Its’ best matchup Mono Green has dwindled, leaving it to try and fight through the red removal of Phoenix, the wraths of Azorius Control, and the stream of constant interaction from Rakdos Midrange.

We’re seeing a return to the period of Pioneer where there’s a range of top decks that can finish in the top 16, but there’s still a concentration of finishes among the top few decks, with 75% of all top 16s coming from the five decks mentioned above. While having five decks make up the top 75% certainly shows some diversity at the top tables, it does show a congealing of the metagame now that Mono Green seems to have been all but figured out by the opposing decks.

Modern

The biggest complaint I’ve seen with Modern right now is the cost of entry. When you look at the winner’s metagame, you see a similar story to most the other formats in that there are 75% of qualifying finishes among decks with two or more top 16s, showing that the top decks have a leg up in consistency. Where Modern differs though, is in the number of decks that managed to snag two or more top 16s this weekend. Unlike the extreme example of Standard with only four decks, Modern had eight decks that secured at least two top 16s in the challenges this weekend.

While Izzet Murktide led the field with five top finishes, Burn wasn’t far behind with four. Azorius Hammer and Grixis Death’s Shadow completed the top four slots with three qualifying finishes each. Yawgmoth, Amulet Titan, 4c Omnath, and Mono White Hammer round out the top 8 decks, each with two top finishes. Despite the consistency of these eight decks putting up multiple top 8 finishes, none of the decks listed above managed to take down the challenges with 4c Creativity and Blink taking home first place on Saturday and Sunday respectively.

creativity
modern
buy from TCGplayer $1068.13

While we see several decks putting up consistent results, the vast array of playable and competitive decks in Modern leave the format in an interesting and diverse place that would be an ideal place for competitive players to make small adjustments and maximize their format knowledge and skill. The only issue remains the cost of entry to the format, which has become more prohibitive since MH2 and seems unlikely to lower any time soon.

Pauper

At first glance, Pauper looks much more balanced than the likes of Standard with seven unique archetypes making up 60% of the top 16s from this past weekend. However, there are some similarities to the style of decks that are currently sitting atop the metagame. The Faeries decks of pauper put up four top finishes with Izzet Faeries, three top finishes with Mono Blue Faeries, and two top finishes with Dimir Faeries. These three archetypes account for nine top finishes or 28% of the winners metagame. While each version has noted differences, that is still a lot of similar cards sitting at the top of the metagame.

Once you move past the Faeries decks, there are a handful of other including: Izzet Blink, Rakdos Burn, Bogles, and Affinity. We saw Faeries lose the finals of Saturday’s challenge but put up five copies into the top 8. On Sunday, only one copy of Faeries made the top 8. Various other decks, primarily the Aggro decks, took the top slots away from the mischievous creatures.

While Faeries took the top spots on Saturday, the quick adaptation and churn of the format appears to indicate that the dedicated Pauper players can adequately adjust and attack top decks, something that sets this format apart from something like Standard.

Legacy

Legacy has been in a somewhat stale state since the release of MH2. While there was a large clamoring for something to be done about the UR Delver menace, even after a ban, the deck continues to sit at the top of the Legacy metagame.

UR Delver
legacy
buy from TCGplayer $3972.55

landsLands (19)

1
Island
0.01$
4
Wasteland
95.96$
4
Scalding Tarn
111.96$
1
Steam Vents
19.99$

instantsInstants (18)

4
Brainstorm
1.96$
2
Pyroblast
9.98$
4
Daze
3.96$
4
Force of Will
379.96$

sorceriesSorceries (9)

4
Ponder
11.16$

artifactsArtifacts (1)

60 cards
15 cards

In the weekend Challenges, both Delver and Elves each managed four top finishes, with Death and Taxes, 8Cast, ANT, and Czech Pile each putting up two top finishes. That means that decks with greater than two top finishes were the minority of decks that finished with a Top 16 this weekend. Approximately 56% of top finishers were single showing decks, meaning that while the format has some clear top contenders, there is a level of parity among the top 16 level of decks.

In fact, despite the top showings of UR Delver and Elves, neither deck managed to take down a challenge this weekend with Death and Taxes and Reanimator claiming those honors. While Elves managed a pair of top 8s on Saturday, by Sunday Elves was relegated to only a pair of top 16s. UR Delver on the other hand put one copy into top 8 on each day but maxed out at 3rd/4th place on Saturday.

This level of parity demonstrates a seemingly healthy format, but there’s always the underlying concern that a deck like UR Delver could come in and crush the next important Legacy event, as it often appeared to in the past whenever events like the Magic Online Championship Series came around. In fact, you start to see elements of that in the overall play percentages of UR Delver totaling over 20% in most major events, much higher than other decks present.

Vintage

Vintage this weekend was a tale of three powerful archetypes: Tinker, Underworld Breach, and Shops. Hogaak was the most played deck of the weekend with 18.6% of the Saturday Challenge total meta-share and 13.5% of Sunday’s.

Saturday was topped by a surprising winner; Oops all Spells. Oops is a fringe Vintage deck and it is always neat to see it putting up results. Saturday’s Top 8 featured 7 different decks. Tinker Underworld Breach was the only deck to have 2 Top 8 results that day. Sunday was won by Aggro Shops. The Top 8 tallied: 2x Shops, 1x RUG Xerox, 1x Esper PO, 1x 4c DRS, 1x Lurrus DRS, 1x Hogaak, and 1x GW Hatebears.

Wrapping Up

There you have it a quick breakdown of all the results from the Magic Online Format challenges from this weekend. You can find all the lists from various challenges including from this weekend here and be sure to check back each week to see what new technology develops and what decks are poised to help you qualify for your upcoming Regional Championship Qualifier.

Thanks for reading and stay safe out there!

up arrowtop