mtg icon Magic: The Gathering
mtg icon Magic: The Gathering

Alchemy Metagame Analysis – Emerging Decks

Overview

In the past week or so, there’s been five Alchemy tournaments hosted, with a reasonably diverse set of decks. It seems like the format is still evolving somewhat, but there are some decks which stand out over the others. I’ll be covering popular decks that seem to make top-8 relatively often, or less played decks that tend to break into the top-8 out of stiff competition.

Many of these decks play cards that I talked about in a previous article:

With our new DotGG Magic: The Gathering tournament series coming up next month (and a Championship Qualifier up for grabs!) and Alchemy fully entrenched into the MTG Arena ecosystem, this is a good time to dive deep into the metagame! Not only that, support will be coming for Alchemy in Arena Opens, Mythic Qualifiers, and even bigger tournaments from Wizards of the Coast in the future.

alchemy
04 Dec 2021 - 25 Jan 2022
scroll right
win
rate
vs
gruul werewolves
vs
izzet control
vs
boros dragons
vs
mono-green aggro
vs
esper clerics
vs
orzhov midrange
vs
azorius control
vs
esper control
vs
rakdos midrange
vs
mono-red dragons
vs
mono-white aggro
vs
dimir control
vs
mono black sacrifice
vs
mono-red aggro
vs
orzhov clerics
vs
rakdos dragons
vs
mono-black control
vs
izzet mill
vs
mono-black midrange
vs
rakdos vampires
vs
jeskai control
gruul werewolves
8.43% metagame
283 matches
global 58.0% [52.1%-63.6%]
-
85.7%
28 matches
42.9%
21 matches
18.8%
16 matches
70.0%
10 matches
66.7%
27 matches
72.2%
18 matches
61.5%
13 matches
68.4%
19 matches
40.0%
10 matches
16.7%
6 matches
60.0%
10 matches
66.7%
3 matches
83.3%
6 matches
28.6%
7 matches
0.0%
5 matches
40.0%
5 matches
60.0%
5 matches
33.3%
3 matches
80.0%
5 matches
87.5%
8 matches
gruul werewolves
8.43% metagame
283 matches
global 58.0% [52.1%-63.6%]
izzet control
7.29% metagame
218 matches
global 45.9% [39.4%-52.5%]
14.3%
28 matches
-
54.5%
11 matches
25.0%
12 matches
53.3%
15 matches
33.3%
21 matches
68.8%
16 matches
78.6%
14 matches
16.7%
12 matches
42.9%
7 matches
62.5%
8 matches
66.7%
3 matches
50.0%
6 matches
80.0%
5 matches
33.3%
3 matches
0.0%
2 matches
42.9%
7 matches
50.0%
2 matches
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
2 matches
50.0%
2 matches
izzet control
7.29% metagame
218 matches
global 45.9% [39.4%-52.5%]
boros dragons
6.26% metagame
204 matches
global 56.4% [49.5%-63%]
57.1%
21 matches
45.5%
11 matches
-
57.1%
14 matches
64.3%
14 matches
54.5%
11 matches
61.5%
13 matches
40.0%
10 matches
44.4%
9 matches
71.4%
7 matches
50.0%
6 matches
75.0%
4 matches
100.0%
3 matches
42.9%
7 matches
25.0%
4 matches
50.0%
2 matches
33.3%
3 matches
0.0%
1 matches
66.7%
6 matches
100.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
boros dragons
6.26% metagame
204 matches
global 56.4% [49.5%-63%]
mono-green aggro
6.04% metagame
202 matches
global 53.0% [46.1%-59.7%]
81.3%
16 matches
75.0%
12 matches
42.9%
14 matches
-
33.3%
15 matches
33.3%
12 matches
45.5%
11 matches
30.8%
13 matches
62.5%
8 matches
33.3%
9 matches
66.7%
6 matches
77.8%
9 matches
57.1%
7 matches
0.0%
2 matches
66.7%
3 matches
100.0%
5 matches
20.0%
5 matches
-
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
1 matches
0.0%
2 matches
mono-green aggro
6.04% metagame
202 matches
global 53.0% [46.1%-59.7%]
esper clerics
5.35% metagame
189 matches
global 53.4% [46.3%-60.4%]
30.0%
10 matches
46.7%
15 matches
35.7%
14 matches
66.7%
15 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
50.0%
10 matches
46.2%
13 matches
20.0%
10 matches
66.7%
3 matches
50.0%
8 matches
100.0%
4 matches
80.0%
5 matches
40.0%
5 matches
75.0%
4 matches
50.0%
2 matches
71.4%
7 matches
-
100.0%
2 matches
-
33.3%
3 matches
esper clerics
5.35% metagame
189 matches
global 53.4% [46.3%-60.4%]
orzhov midrange
5.35% metagame
175 matches
global 55.4% [48%-62.6%]
33.3%
27 matches
66.7%
21 matches
45.5%
11 matches
66.7%
12 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
40.0%
5 matches
71.4%
7 matches
44.4%
9 matches
72.7%
11 matches
33.3%
3 matches
50.0%
4 matches
-
50.0%
4 matches
66.7%
6 matches
66.7%
3 matches
33.3%
3 matches
75.0%
4 matches
100.0%
2 matches
60.0%
5 matches
-
orzhov midrange
5.35% metagame
175 matches
global 55.4% [48%-62.6%]
azorius control
5.01% metagame
159 matches
global 44.0% [36.5%-51.8%]
27.8%
18 matches
31.3%
16 matches
38.5%
13 matches
54.5%
11 matches
50.0%
10 matches
60.0%
5 matches
-
66.7%
9 matches
25.0%
4 matches
75.0%
4 matches
25.0%
4 matches
16.7%
6 matches
25.0%
8 matches
50.0%
4 matches
0.0%
1 matches
25.0%
4 matches
25.0%
4 matches
100.0%
1 matches
66.7%
3 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
azorius control
5.01% metagame
159 matches
global 44.0% [36.5%-51.8%]
esper control
4.44% metagame
148 matches
global 45.9% [38.1%-54%]
38.5%
13 matches
21.4%
14 matches
60.0%
10 matches
69.2%
13 matches
53.8%
13 matches
28.6%
7 matches
33.3%
9 matches
-
0.0%
5 matches
25.0%
4 matches
40.0%
5 matches
33.3%
3 matches
100.0%
1 matches
33.3%
3 matches
25.0%
4 matches
0.0%
1 matches
50.0%
2 matches
0.0%
1 matches
100.0%
2 matches
100.0%
1 matches
66.7%
3 matches
esper control
4.44% metagame
148 matches
global 45.9% [38.1%-54%]
rakdos midrange
4.44% metagame
142 matches
global 61.3% [53.1%-68.9%]
31.6%
19 matches
83.3%
12 matches
55.6%
9 matches
37.5%
8 matches
80.0%
10 matches
55.6%
9 matches
75.0%
4 matches
100.0%
5 matches
-
33.3%
6 matches
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
1 matches
25.0%
4 matches
66.7%
3 matches
50.0%
2 matches
25.0%
4 matches
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
2 matches
-
100.0%
2 matches
rakdos midrange
4.44% metagame
142 matches
global 61.3% [53.1%-68.9%]
mono-red dragons
3.08% metagame
107 matches
global 53.3% [43.9%-62.4%]
60.0%
10 matches
57.1%
7 matches
28.6%
7 matches
66.7%
9 matches
33.3%
3 matches
27.3%
11 matches
25.0%
4 matches
75.0%
4 matches
66.7%
6 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
50.0%
2 matches
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
3 matches
33.3%
3 matches
100.0%
1 matches
40.0%
5 matches
0.0%
2 matches
0.0%
1 matches
-
100.0%
2 matches
mono-red dragons
3.08% metagame
107 matches
global 53.3% [43.9%-62.4%]
mono-white aggro
2.96% metagame
104 matches
global 47.1% [37.8%-56.6%]
83.3%
6 matches
37.5%
8 matches
50.0%
6 matches
33.3%
6 matches
50.0%
8 matches
66.7%
3 matches
75.0%
4 matches
60.0%
5 matches
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
66.7%
3 matches
10.0%
10 matches
0.0%
2 matches
33.3%
3 matches
50.0%
2 matches
-
100.0%
2 matches
-
0.0%
3 matches
0.0%
2 matches
mono-white aggro
2.96% metagame
104 matches
global 47.1% [37.8%-56.6%]
dimir control
2.62% metagame
85 matches
global 37.6% [28.1%-48.3%]
40.0%
10 matches
33.3%
3 matches
25.0%
4 matches
22.2%
9 matches
0.0%
4 matches
50.0%
4 matches
83.3%
6 matches
66.7%
3 matches
0.0%
1 matches
50.0%
2 matches
33.3%
3 matches
-
100.0%
3 matches
0.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
-
33.3%
3 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
-
-
dimir control
2.62% metagame
85 matches
global 37.6% [28.1%-48.3%]
mono black sacrifice
2.39% metagame
85 matches
global 49.4% [39%-59.8%]
33.3%
3 matches
50.0%
6 matches
0.0%
3 matches
42.9%
7 matches
20.0%
5 matches
-
75.0%
8 matches
0.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
50.0%
2 matches
90.0%
10 matches
0.0%
3 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
57.1%
7 matches
-
-
-
-
0.0%
1 matches
mono black sacrifice
2.39% metagame
85 matches
global 49.4% [39%-59.8%]
mono-red aggro
2.28% metagame
76 matches
global 55.3% [44.1%-65.9%]
16.7%
6 matches
20.0%
5 matches
57.1%
7 matches
100.0%
2 matches
60.0%
5 matches
50.0%
4 matches
50.0%
4 matches
66.7%
3 matches
75.0%
4 matches
0.0%
3 matches
100.0%
2 matches
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
-
66.7%
6 matches
-
0.0%
2 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
100.0%
3 matches
mono-red aggro
2.28% metagame
76 matches
global 55.3% [44.1%-65.9%]
orzhov clerics
1.82% metagame
65 matches
global 53.8% [41.9%-65.4%]
71.4%
7 matches
66.7%
3 matches
75.0%
4 matches
33.3%
3 matches
25.0%
4 matches
33.3%
6 matches
100.0%
1 matches
75.0%
4 matches
33.3%
3 matches
66.7%
3 matches
66.7%
3 matches
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
-
0.0%
2 matches
-
-
0.0%
2 matches
-
-
orzhov clerics
1.82% metagame
65 matches
global 53.8% [41.9%-65.4%]
rakdos dragons
1.71% metagame
65 matches
global 52.3% [40.4%-64%]
100.0%
5 matches
100.0%
2 matches
50.0%
2 matches
0.0%
5 matches
50.0%
2 matches
33.3%
3 matches
75.0%
4 matches
100.0%
1 matches
50.0%
2 matches
0.0%
1 matches
50.0%
2 matches
-
42.9%
7 matches
33.3%
6 matches
100.0%
2 matches
-
-
100.0%
1 matches
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
rakdos dragons
1.71% metagame
65 matches
global 52.3% [40.4%-64%]
mono-black control
1.59% metagame
65 matches
global 58.5% [46.3%-69.6%]
60.0%
5 matches
57.1%
7 matches
66.7%
3 matches
80.0%
5 matches
28.6%
7 matches
66.7%
3 matches
75.0%
4 matches
50.0%
2 matches
75.0%
4 matches
60.0%
5 matches
-
66.7%
3 matches
-
-
-
-
-
50.0%
2 matches
-
33.3%
3 matches
-
mono-black control
1.59% metagame
65 matches
global 58.5% [46.3%-69.6%]
izzet mill
1.37% metagame
41 matches
global 43.9% [29.9%-59%]
40.0%
5 matches
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
-
25.0%
4 matches
0.0%
1 matches
100.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
100.0%
2 matches
0.0%
2 matches
-
-
100.0%
2 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
50.0%
2 matches
-
-
0.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
izzet mill
1.37% metagame
41 matches
global 43.9% [29.9%-59%]
mono-black midrange
1.25% metagame
39 matches
global 46.2% [31.6%-61.4%]
66.7%
3 matches
50.0%
2 matches
33.3%
6 matches
50.0%
2 matches
0.0%
2 matches
0.0%
2 matches
33.3%
3 matches
0.0%
2 matches
0.0%
2 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
100.0%
1 matches
-
-
100.0%
2 matches
50.0%
2 matches
-
-
-
-
0.0%
1 matches
mono-black midrange
1.25% metagame
39 matches
global 46.2% [31.6%-61.4%]
rakdos vampires
1.25% metagame
38 matches
global 50.0% [34.8%-65.2%]
20.0%
5 matches
0.0%
2 matches
0.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
-
40.0%
5 matches
0.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
-
-
100.0%
3 matches
-
-
100.0%
1 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
66.7%
3 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
-
-
rakdos vampires
1.25% metagame
38 matches
global 50.0% [34.8%-65.2%]
jeskai control
1.14% metagame
40 matches
global 47.5% [32.9%-62.5%]
12.5%
8 matches
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
2 matches
66.7%
3 matches
-
-
33.3%
3 matches
0.0%
2 matches
0.0%
2 matches
100.0%
2 matches
-
100.0%
1 matches
0.0%
3 matches
-
-
-
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
-
jeskai control
1.14% metagame
40 matches
global 47.5% [32.9%-62.5%]
vs
gruul werewolves
vs
izzet control
vs
boros dragons
vs
mono-green aggro
vs
esper clerics
vs
orzhov midrange
vs
azorius control
vs
esper control
vs
rakdos midrange
vs
mono-red dragons
vs
mono-white aggro
vs
dimir control
vs
mono black sacrifice
vs
mono-red aggro
vs
orzhov clerics
vs
rakdos dragons
vs
mono-black control
vs
izzet mill
vs
mono-black midrange
vs
rakdos vampires
vs
jeskai control

Decks

Black-Based Sacrifice

mono black sacrifice
49.4% global win rate
2.39% metagame share
best against
vs mono-white aggro
90.0% win rate
10 tracked matches
vs azorius control
75.0% win rate
8 tracked matches
vs rakdos dragons
57.1% win rate
7 tracked matches
worst against
vs mono-green aggro
42.9% win rate
7 tracked matches
vs rakdos sacrifice
40.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
vs esper clerics
20.0% win rate
5 tracked matches

There are various flavours of the black sacrifice decks, but the core of the deck is well rooted in black. The core of the deck is made up of Sanguine Brushstroke, The Meathook Massacre, sac outlets (Deadly Dispute, Fell Stinger and Skullport Merchant), Voldaren Bloodcaster and plenty of sac fodder (Shambling Ghast, Eyetwitch, Cursebound Witch and Pest Summoning).

The deck’s plan is to sacrifice creatures for massive value and slowly drain the opponent to death. The Blood Artist from Sanguine Brushstroke and The Meathook Massacre drain/ping the opponent when a creature dies, while Voldaren Bloodcaster produces blood tokens. These sacrificing these tokens with Sanguine Brushstroke on the field further drains the opponent, whittling down their life point by point.

mono black sacrifice
alchemy
buy from TCGplayer $207.34
60 cards
15 cards

golgari sacrifice
55.6% global win rate
0.34% metagame share

The variations on the deck all follow the same plan as above, but reach into another colour for additional cards. Golgari sac gets access to Dina, Soul Steeper, which further pings the opponent while being a sac outlet, and Mortality Spear which is almost always 2 mana, and destroys any problematic permanent. This version hasn’t seen any top 8 finishes, but I personally think that’s due to the lists looking somewhat unoptimized rather than the Golgari version being massively worse than the others.

rakdos sacrifice
40% global win rate
0.68% metagame share
best against
vs mono black sacrifice
60.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
worst against
vs esper clerics
0.0% win rate
5 tracked matches

Another variation that has made top 8 is a Rakdos Sac deck, which leans a little more into the blood side of the deck. Playing Voldaren Epicure and Bloodtithe Harvester which generate blood (along with Bloodtithe Harvester acting as removal). Unlike the Golgari version, it leans much harder into red, also playing Orcus, Prince of Undeath and Stensia Uprising. Stensia Uprising helps generate fodder, and can finish and opponent off, while Orcus, Prince of Undeath can sweep the board, taking out your own creatures en masse, or bring back a bunch of creature from the graveyard.


Red-Based Dragons

mono-red dragons
53.3% global win rate
3.08% metagame share
best against
vs rakdos midrange
66.7% win rate
6 tracked matches
vs mono-green aggro
66.7% win rate
9 tracked matches
vs gruul werewolves
60.0% win rate
10 tracked matches
worst against
vs mono-black control
40.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
vs boros dragons
28.6% win rate
7 tracked matches
vs orzhov midrange
27.3% win rate
11 tracked matches

Another deck that has a variety of flavours are the Dragon decks. The core of the deck revolves around Fearsome Whelp, Town-razer Tyrant and A-Goldspan Dragon. The deck also tends to play a variety of other dragons (often including Moonveil Regent and Inferno of the Star Mounts), Orb of Dragonkind as acceleration and card draw, and some early removal (with Dragon's Fire being the card of choice). 

The plan of the deck is to stem aggression early with cheap removal, play out either Fearsome Whelp or Orb of Dragonkind, and then play large dragons ahead of curve. Fearsome Whelp is absolutely the lynchpin of the deck, as with it you can curve a 2-drop into a 4-drop into a 6-drop, which is a beating. I’d call the deck midrange, but it really leans to the aggressive side of that.

mono-red dragons
alchemy
buy from TCGplayer $99.96

boros dragons
56.4% global win rate
6.26% metagame share
best against
vs mono-red dragons
71.4% win rate
7 tracked matches
vs mono-black midrange
66.7% win rate
6 tracked matches
vs esper clerics
64.3% win rate
14 tracked matches
worst against
vs rakdos midrange
44.4% win rate
9 tracked matches
vs mono-red aggro
42.9% win rate
7 tracked matches
vs esper control
40.0% win rate
10 tracked matches

One variation on the deck is Boros Dragons. This deck runs the same core as the Mono-Red version, but plays Adult Gold Dragon to help stabilise better, and Valorous Stance as protection/removal. Some other versions also play other dragons like Nadaar, Selfless Paladin or a one-of Velomachus Lorehold. Some versions even play Divine Purge, which while doesn’t hit many of the dragons, does put more of a strain on the manabase.

rakdos dragons
52.3% global win rate
1.71% metagame share
best against
vs gruul werewolves
100.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
worst against
vs mono black sacrifice
42.9% win rate
7 tracked matches
vs mono-red aggro
33.3% win rate
6 tracked matches
vs mono-green aggro
0.0% win rate
5 tracked matches

Another variation on the deck is Rakdos Dragons, which brings to mind the Jund Midrange decks from MID. The deck plays Kalain, Reclusive Painter (which plays particularly well with A-Goldspan Dragon) and Immersturm Predator, which happens to be a dragon. As well, the deck adds Infernal Grasp to its repertoire, which is an incredibly efficient removal spell that hits small or big things.


Azorius Control

azorius control
44% global win rate
5.01% metagame share
best against
vs esper control
66.7% win rate
9 tracked matches
vs orzhov midrange
60.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
vs mono-green aggro
54.5% win rate
11 tracked matches
worst against
vs gruul werewolves
27.8% win rate
18 tracked matches
vs mono black sacrifice
25.0% win rate
8 tracked matches
vs dimir control
16.7% win rate
6 tracked matches

Azorius Control doesn’t quite have the same clean subdivisions as the previous decks, but there is huge variety between the builds that have been played in the tournaments. Some of the standout alchemy cards in the deck are Divine Purge, Discover the Formula and occasionally Geistchanneler or Unexpected Conversion. Other common cards are Doomskar and  card name=”Divide by Zero”], alongside Lier, Disciple of the Drowned and occasionally Hullbreaker Horror.

One distinct sub-archetype I  can see in the Azorius Control decks however is the combination of Teferi, Who Slows the Sunset and Key to the Archive, which operate incredibly well together. Key to the Archive gives the deck access to a variety of powerful spells from the Mystical Archive cards, which otherwise don’t exist in the format. As well, untapping it with Teferi, Who Slows the Sunset does a fairly decent impression of Teferi, Hero of Dominaria.

Between all of the decks however, the plan is the same: Disable your opponent’s threats, and outvalue them, working towards your finisher. In most cases this is either Hullbreaker Horror or animating Hall of Storm Giants.


Mono-Green Aggro

mono-green aggro
53% global win rate
6.04% metagame share
best against
vs rakdos dragons
100.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
vs gruul werewolves
81.3% win rate
16 tracked matches
vs dimir control
77.8% win rate
9 tracked matches
worst against
vs orzhov midrange
33.3% win rate
12 tracked matches
vs esper control
30.8% win rate
13 tracked matches
vs mono-black control
20.0% win rate
5 tracked matches

This Mono-Green deck is similar to it’s standard counterpart. It plays Ranger Class, Blizzard Brawl, Werewolf Pack Leader, Sculptor of Winter and Old-Growth Troll. Notably, since the alchemy format has A-Esika's Chariot, and not Esika's Chariot, the card is nowhere to be found in the lists.

Some of the new alchemy cards that see play in the lists are Tenacious Pup (which is a 4-of in just about all of the decks), Lupine Harbingers and, recently, Garruk, Wrath of the WIlds. Tenacious Pup is honestly one of the best cards in the deck, making any of the already big green threats much, much scarier. Similarly, Lupine Harbingers, while a bigger mana investment, can end the game out of nowhere. An unchecked Garruk, Wrath of the WIlds can also end the game incredibly quickly, ultimating on it’s 3rd turn on the battlefield, with an ability which makes your creatures nigh impossible to block.


Esper Clerics

esper clerics
53.4% global win rate
5.35% metagame share
best against
vs rakdos sacrifice
100.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
vs mono black sacrifice
80.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
vs mono-black control
71.4% win rate
7 tracked matches
worst against
vs boros dragons
35.7% win rate
14 tracked matches
vs gruul werewolves
30.0% win rate
10 tracked matches
vs rakdos midrange
20.0% win rate
10 tracked matches

This deck has had a few variations of it, but none seem to hold up anywhere near as well as the Esper version. Being a cleric deck, almost all of the cards in the deck are clerics, and the deck takes advantage of this by playing Pyre of Heroes. As well, the deck plays a high density of creatures for Inquisitor Captain. Alongside it are powerful cards like Orah, Skyclave Hierophant, Elite Spellbinder, and  Righteous Valkyrie. With Righteous Valkyrie, the deck also plays into the lifegain aspect with cards like Lunarch Veteran, Voice of the Blessed and Cleric of Life's Bond.

What makes the Esper version so much better than the other version is the combination of Glasspool Mimic and Inquisitor Captain. Being able to add multiple bodies onto the field with one card, and having all of the lifegain triggers that come along with it, is incredibly strong in the deck. It can often take a Voice of the Blessed from a 2/2 to a 6/6, or bringing you to 27 life so that Righteous Valkyrie enables a devastating attack.

Another impressive, if fringe, combo is Orah, Skyclave Hierophant and Sigardian Evangel. Since you always end up discarding a copy of Sigardian Evangel, late in the game you can sac a 3 or 4 mana cleric to Pyre of Heroes, and get back a Sigardian Evangel from the graveyard and play out the copies and tap thing down. Then, another copy goes to the graveyard, so the process can repeat the next turn.


Final Notes

All of the above decks are powerful, and rely on some amount of the digital-only Alchemy cards. Considering many of the new cards are on the pushed side, I don’t know how much success you can have if you stick simply to the standard card pool when trying to make a deck. With that said though, the better the card is the more likely it will be to be rebalanced, so be careful how you spend your wildcards.

As for which deck to build, while the data is fairly limited, right now my suggestion would be the Mono-Red Dragons deck. It’s packed with highly powerful cards, and can have explosive starts when Fearsome Whelp isn’t dealt with immediately. As well, while A-Goldspan Dragon is weaker (since it doesn’t make a treasure when targeted anymore), it still is an incredibly aggressive threat which provides a huge mana boost – great for the expensive dragons that are played. As well, it has access to good removal, especially where Dragon's Fire is almost always going to deal 4 damage, and can easily deal more. While not the most intricate deck, I think it has enough interaction to keep other decks from running it over, and is aggressive enough to kill first, or go under control.

mono-red dragons
alchemy
buy from TCGplayer $99.96

My second pick would be the Black-Based Sacrifice decks. While different builds drift between Mono-Black, Rakdos, Golgari, and possibly Orzhov, the core cards needed for the deck carry between them. I also think  the deck can adjust better to the meta than something like the Dragons decks can by changing (or removing) the splash colour. Being able to go from a more aggressive build with Bloodtithe Harvester and Stensia Uprising, to a more controlling build with Dina, Soul Steeper and Mortality Spear is something I think that will keep the deck as a force in the meta.

mono black sacrifice
alchemy
buy from TCGplayer $207.34
60 cards
15 cards
up arrowtop